Wow. Soooo very not. And she has the nerve to go to Mr. Chow's where there is known paparazzi 24 hours a day. Damn.
Love the shoes, but everything else is a bit much.
Animal print ... okay, we won't talk about the knee length sundress over skinny jeans ... In this instance, going in odd numbers is too much. I think the shoe/hat, shoe/bag, or bag/hat combo might have worked, but all three are overkill. She can be such a stunner, but this is more miss than hit.
WAY to much going on at one time.
not cute!she is a ("Ham" aka hot ass mess)
Like the shoes, but other animal attire is growling.
Baby-girl needs a professional stylist on her team... No.
Now I will say this, I'm a fan of animal print... but not all over head to toe "matchy matchy" like what she's doing here. I agree with what everybody said. And I think she would have been better off wearing her print on ONE THING (like her shoes, OR her hat, OR the purse, etc...) to make it a nice accent to her outfit.But I'm also with Kira... the knee length sundress over the jeans on top of everything else? No.
No - I adore leopard, but this is too much! I'd say two pieces at the most.
OH HECK NO!You explained what I was thinking so eloquently. WAY too much going on at once... and to be honest, I don't particularly like the hat on her whether it's worn alone or with a heap of other animal prints... ALL IN ALL: Yuck-o-rama! NOT CUTE.
There are too many things going on here, and not in a good way.
A steaming hot ghetto fried mess. That is all.
LOVE the bag but the outft together is way too busy. I suggest losing the hat or maybe a shorter length shirt would draw less attention.
I'm loving her Kathy van Zeeland bag! I just saw a few at Macy's.
Just the shoes or just the bag would've been enough for one outfit!
I'm not really into animal printed clothing and accessories. i like the bag, but the hat= no. Shoes, err, she could've done without.
Post a Comment